A man identified as NwachuMan de@d, wife hospitalised after inhaling generator fumes in Ogun
A man identified as Nwachu
A man identified as NwachuDavido knocks INEC as he reveals why he is interested in Edo gubernatorial election
Як не допустити появу небажаних жучків в квасолі, яку ви зберігаєте
Дрібні жучки можуть оселитися в банці квасолі навіть у тому випадку, якщо вона була щільно закрита кришкою. Знищує запаси жук-зернівка, та не він сам, а його личинки, які потрапляють у стручки квасолі ще тоді, коли вона була на городі. Помітити їх під час лущення неможливо, і саме тому необхідно підстрахуватися від можливої неприємності заздалегідь. Подробиці […]Anand Teltumbde Wiki, Age, Caste, Wife, Children, Family, Biography & More
Anand Teltumbde is an Indian civil rights activist who has been in the news for his alleged involvement in the ...
Read More »
I’ve already spent all my cash in Tesco but couldn’t resist the perfect knitted dress – it’s like the viral H&M one
WITH autumn just around the corner, it may be time to stock up on some new pieces for your wardrobe.
Fashionista Lacey shared how she had spotted the perfect knitted dress from Tesco that looks ideal for chillier months.
On her @laceylouise.xo1 account she wrote: “girls RUN to tesco for the cutest knitted dress.”
The chic item is from the F&F range, and has a rib knit material and long sleeves.
It also has a round neckline and ends in a peplum style at the waist.
And thankfully it won’t break the bank at £25.
Alongside showing it in the shop, Lacey also showed herself trying it on at home, and it looked like the ideal dress for the new season.
But she admitted she may have to wait until payday to snap it up.
One viewer commented: “I’ll have to wait till next Thursday when it’s payday. Tesco have already robbed my bank”, to which Lacey replied: “Me too.”
Many people seemed keen to add the Tesco item to their wardrobe.
One said: “I loooove these style dresses.
“I wear them every autumn/winter to work, family events, literally everywhere.”
A second added: “This would look so nice on your with tights and boots.”
The dress looks remarkably similar to the viral H&M autumn dress from last year that they have now rereleased this year.
Some shoppers even pointed out the resemblance, with one saying: “this is reminding me of the h&m winter dress from last year.”
Many people raved about the garment last year, and it’s now back in beige, pink and khaki for 2024.
The description reads: “Short, fitted dress in a soft rib knit with a fully-fashioned section at the front and back.
“Round neckline, gently dropped shoulders, long sleeves, flared cuffs with a slit, and gently flared skirt.”
Primark's best buys for Autumn
Heading into Primark soon? Keep an eye out for these items.
Here, Fabulous fashion editor Clemmie Fieldsend reveals her top 6 buys from Primark this Autumn.
Coat, £60
I know what you’re thinking, ‘£60 for Primark?’ Yes it’s a higher price tag than we’re used to from Primark but its worth every penny.
It’s from their Edit range which is more premium than the rest of their collection and it’s made to last.
It’s a mixed wool blend which is durable and warm, plus its a timeless straight silhouette which is slightly oversized and will last you not only this season but for many after.
Bag, £16
Big bags are back… In a big way, finally.
This tote screams luxury with its croc effect and burnt orange colour, plus its great for shoving in your laptop, lunch, spare shoes, purse – essentially everything you need for the day – all for £16.
Jacket, £32
Field jackets are on the backs of celebrities and catwalk models this season with designer brands Barbour, Burberry and Bottega all championing the utilitarian look.
They’re great for chucking over jeans or contrasting with a floral or floaty dress and are the perfect transitional jacket.
Dress, £18,
You may have seen, heard and read that leopard print isn’t going anywhere for autumn, so to encapsulate the trend this dress is a must.
Sleeves? Check. Midi length? Check. Ultra flattering square neck? Check. It’s got it all.
Pair with black knee high boots or your favourite trainers for the day and dress up with gold heels and accessories for the evening.
Jeans, £16
Barrel, balloon, horseshoe – whatever you want to call them, they are the must have trouser shape of this season.
I’ve tried Primarks pair and they fit like a dream, are comfortable and flattering.
So if you think you have nothing that hits the trend mark, swapping your go-to denim for this shape will bring you bang up to date.
Boots, £24
It’s boot season and instead of feeling like you need to buy one in every colour, length, height – its best to stick to a pair that you can wear with the majority of your wardrobe.
My jaw almost hit the floor when I saw that this black, knee-high, block heel with flat point and side zip (so there’s no tug of war to get them off at the end of the day) was only £24.
If you buy one thing this season, it should be these.
Growing number of NYC students feel unsafe as gang activity, bullying uptick in schools: survey
Fear seems to go hand in hand with gangs -- and guns, kids told The Post.
Read More »
Imo police command arrest officers caught on tape confronting man accused of drug-trafficking
The Imo State PoliceBoy abducted at the age of 6 is finally found alive after 73 years
The abduction of a six-yeaІдеальний вік для пологів – це 25
Найкраще народжувати дитину в 25 років. Якщо жінки проходять через пологи в цьому віці, то вони живуть довше, як встановили вчені з Університету Сеула в Південній Кореї. Жінки, які народили дітей у віці 25 років мають максимальну тривалістю життя. Раніше вчені теж пов’язували пологи після 30 з тривалістю життя, проте експерти припускали, що народження дитини […]Prince Harry & Meghan Markle have lost Hollywood – America’s sick of their bleeding heart moaning, says expert
PRINCE Harry and Meghan Markle have “lost Hollywood” and “once you’re out, you’re out”, claims a PR commentator.
Mark Borkowski appeared on The Sun’s Royal Exclusive show following Meghan being dubbed “Duchess Difficult” by staff, according to a brutal US report.
The Duchess of Sussex, 43, was described as a “dictator in high heels” who fires off raging emails to employees at all hours, as reported by The Hollywood Reporter.
Mark told The Sun’s Royal Editor Matt Wilkinson: “I think they probably have lost Hollywood.
“One thing about Hollywood is that it’s the home of corporate entertainment, the world of the business of show, and it’s a small community.
“Once you’re out, you’re out, and that’s why PR is knee-deep in the heart of Beverly Hills.
“Some of my friends in that sort of line of work in that part of the world will say, ‘Our job is to protect our clients from themselves.’”
The PR guru described Hollywood as a “brutal world” and said the “Maverick royal couple” had initially been embraced with “all their glamour.”
However, following a number of their bombshell interviews criticising the royal family, he claimed the shine may have disappeared on their grand arrival.
Sussex ventures
Mark explained: “There’s only so far you can operate with a bleeding heart, constantly talking about your distance and the way the royal family has treated you.
“Sooner or later, that seemed to be the continual narrative that never changed.
“The biggest problem for them is that many of their ventures have not worked, and that became news.
“The Netflix deals, podcasts, and content just didn’t work.
“There are only so many Oprah-style interviews you can actually do.
“If you don’t have the currency and are perceived as negative, and your inner sanctum, your staff, reflects poor judgement, then you lose your power.”
There’s only so far you can operate with a bleeding heart, constantly talking about your distance and the way the royal family has treated you
Mark Borkowski
The PR expert also pointed out the challenges the Sussexes have had with funding their new lifestyle, following purchasing their £12million Montecito mansion in California.
He continued: “In Hollywood, it’s also about making money, and they need to make a lot of money because they’re cut off from the source.
“If there’s no positivity, no smiles, and just angst covering their brand, then it becomes unwound.”
Critical report
A source, said to be close to the California-based couple, claimed to The Hollywood Reporter: “Everyone’s terrified of Meghan.
“She belittles people, she doesn’t take advice.
“They’re both poor decision-makers, they change their minds frequently.
“Harry is a very, very charming person — no airs at all — but he’s very much an enabler. And she’s just terrible.”
The respected trade publication claimed that “noisy tantrums and angry 5am emails” had earned Meghan the title of “Duchess Difficult”.
Last month it was reported consultant Josh Kettler had quit as the Sussexes’ chief of staff after just three months, although the royal couple claim it was by mutual decision.
Harry’s US reception
However, this comes on the back of two new YouGov polls commissioned by The Times on either side of the Atlantic show Prince Harry is far more popular Stateside than in the UK.
In the survey, 49 per cent of US citizens had a positive view of Harry, 24 per cent reported a negative view.
In the UK, this was lower with 26 per cent having a positive view, compared to 62 per cent having a negative view.
Prince William was the most popular royal on both sides of the pond, with a 75 per cent positive rate in the UK and 54 per cent in the US.
Meanwhile, Princess Kate had a 74 per cent positive view in the UK, compared to 43 per cent in the US.
A timeline of Prince Harry's family feud
The first hints of friction reportedly came after William was introduced to Meghan when she was staying at Kensington Palace.
Once she’d returned home to Canada, William and Harry sat down for a brother-to-brother chat.
He knew Harry was already head-over-heels for her but it has been claimed he advised him to take it slowly.
The younger prince reportedly didn’t take too kindly to the advice, with one royal source saying he “went mental”.
Then in June 2019 Harry and Meghan officially split off from the charity they shared with William and Kate.
The Royal Foundation will be divided between the Sussexes and Cambridges as the couples focus on their own separate charitable endeavours.
Prince William and Prince Harry first established the Royal Foundation in 2009 before Kate joined two years later shortly after their engagement was announced.
The trio would often appear together at events and the Foundation had huge successes with projects like the Invictus Games for injured veterans and the mental health Heads Together campaign.
The Royal Foundation said the decision was made following the conclusion of a review into its structure – but added both couples will continue to work together in the future.
Harry and Meg were living in close proximity to Kate and Wills within the Kensington Palace estate, but they switched to Frogmore Cottage in Windsor before baby Archie was born.
The move further increased rumours of a fallout.
Harry also hinted in his ITV documentary “Harry and Meghan, An African Journey” that he and his brother had grown apart.
In 2021, Harry and Meghan give their bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey where Harry accused his dad of cutting him off financially.
Harry then jetted back to UK to join William in unveiling a statue to their mother Princess Diana in the grounds of Kensington Palace. But sources claimed William didn’t want to attend the memorial amid their ongoing rift.
In 2022, just before their grandmother the Queen died, sources claimed Kate acts as a “peacemaker” between the brothers.
Harry claimed his brother “knocked him to the floor” during an argument about Meghan, in his memoir.
In Spare, Harry said William branded Meghan “rude” and “difficult” during a row.
Harry alleged William “grabbed me by the collar, ripping my necklace, and … knocked me to the floor”.
He said he was left with a visible injury to his back following the argument in 2019 at Nottingham Cottage on the grounds of Kensington Palace, where he was living at the time.
In January this year, Harry flew in to be with Charles after the monarch’s shock cancer diagnosis.
Harry flew back to the US the following day – without seeing Wills.
In May he visited the UK for a three-day visit without seeing King Charles or Prince William.